Author: Eric Deabill

VATICAN CITY (CNS) – Local churches and bishops worldwide will be instrumental in helping implement the proposals and foster the spirit of the 2024 final document of the Synod of Bishops on synodality, the Vatican synod office said.

To more effectively carry out the mission of evangelization, the implementation phase of the synod “aims to examine new practices and structures that will make the life of the church more synodal,” the General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops said in a new set of guidelines released July 7.

“Concretely, the priority is to offer the people of God new opportunities to walk together and reflect on these experiences in order to reap their fruits for the mission and share them,” the text said.

The 24-page text, titled “Pathways for the Implementation Phase of the Synod,” is a guide for bishops and synodal teams, and an invitation to them to share their initiatives as they apply the synod on synodality’s final proposals locally. It also seeks to answer some key questions the office received recently. The text was released in multiple languages at synod.va.

Divided into four chapters, the document offers responses to: What is the implementation phase and what are its objectives?; Who will participate in the implementation phase and what are their tasks and responsibilities?; How to engage with the 2024 synod assembly’s final document during the implementation phase?; And what method and tools can help shape the implementation phase?

The guidelines underline how the local churches must play an active role in this phase, including by reaching out to diverse communities such as the marginalized, young people and those resistant to the synodal process, because, “in order to truly walk together, we cannot lose the contribution of their point of view.”

Engagement should extend beyond the parish to include schools, hospitals, prisons and digital platforms, it said, and relations with religious communities, movements and associations should be strengthened to further exchange the variety of gifts toward mission.

Synodality “cannot be a path limited to a core group of ‘supporters,'” it said.

“On the contrary, it is important that this new process contribute concretely ‘to expand possibilities for participation and for the exercise of differentiated co-responsibility by all the baptized, men and women’ in a spirit of reciprocity,” it said. “Moreover, it is crucial that it aims to involve those who have so far remained on the margins of the ecclesial renewal process established by the synod.”

The diocesan or eparchial bishop is the first person responsible for the implementation phase, the guidelines said. “It is his responsibility to initiate it, officially indicate its duration, methods and objectives, accompany its progress and conclude it, validating its results.”

This phase “will be an appropriate opportunity to exercise authority in a synodal way,” it said, reminding bishops they are not alone and should encourage all members of the church to share the journey together.

Synodal teams and participatory bodies “will be essential in the implementation phase as well,” the guidelines said, so “existing teams should be valued and, where necessary, renewed; those that have been suspended should be reactivated and appropriately integrated; and new teams should be formed where they have not been established previously.”

Every diocese or eparchy also needs to register its synodal team with the synod office by requesting a link to its database at synodus@synod.va to aid communication and effective coordination, it said.

The implementation phase of the synod was opened by Pope Francis in November 2024 when he called upon local churches, bishops’ conferences and others to implement “the authoritative proposals contained in the document through the processes of discernment and decision-making provided for by law and by the document itself,” the late pope wrote.

The three-year period of implementation and evaluation on the local, national, regional and international levels will culminate in a “celebration of the ecclesial assembly” in October 2028 at the Vatican “to share the fruits of the implementation phase and to have a kind of evaluation,” Xavière Missionary Sister Nathalie Becquart, undersecretary of the Synod of Bishops, said.

“The best way to start the implementation phase is really to read the final document of the synod. That is the reference for this implementation phase,” she said in an interview with Vatican News July 7.

The new guidelines then “are a kind of tool to help to dive into the final document of the synod and to take it up in a discerning way, to see how to implement it at the local level, also with this creativity that is coming from the Holy Spirit, because you can’t have just one way for everybody all over the world,” she added.

The synod’s final document “is the point of reference for the implementation phase,” the guidelines said.

The mission of proclaiming the Kingdom of God “constitutes the backbone” and final goal of the synod’s final document, the text said. “Reflections on the tools to be adopted or the reforms to be implemented should always be placed within the perspective of the mission.”

The final document “firmly promotes a church that is increasingly courageous in its outreach,” it said, and “it embraces the conciliar vision of a church in the world, in dialogue with everyone, with other religious traditions and with the entire community.”

“Growing as a synodal church capable of dialogue has a prophetic value that includes a commitment to social justice and integral ecology. These dimensions cannot be neglected in the implementation phase, leading to the creation of opportunities for dialogue based on the concrete needs of the territories and societies in which we live,” the text said.

Sister Becquart said the guidelines and the implementation phase are a prime opportunity for the “exchange of gifts” between the local churches, which is “a core notion of the final document, a core notion of a synodal church.”

“We all have something to give and something to receive,” she said. “This document is also really to highlight that you can’t just do your synodal conversion alone, but it’s very important to work together as different local churches.” 

VATICAN CITY (OSV News) – Three North Americans are among recent appointees to Vatican dicasteries that address issues of ecumenism and interreligious dialogue.

On July 3, Pope Leo XIV appointed Archbishop Mitchell T. Rozanski of St. Louis and Cardinal Frank Leo of Toronto as members of the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue, along with 19 other bishops from around the world.

The same day, Pope Leo appointed Holy Cross Father Russell McDougall as a consultor of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity. Father McDougall is executive director of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs.

As an administrative body of the Roman Curia, the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue “promotes and supervises relations with members and groups of non-Christian religions, with the exception of Judaism, competence for which belongs to the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity,” according to the Vatican website.

Meanwhile, the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity describes itself as promoting within the church “an authentic ecumenical spirit” and as “active in all areas that can contribute to promoting Christian unity by strengthening relationships with other Churches and Ecclesial Communities.”

Archbishop Rozanski, who has considerable experience engaging in formal and informal interreligious and ecumenical dialogue, said in a July 3 statement he was “deeply humbled” by the appointment.

“I am grateful to His Holiness for his trust and look forward to participating in the fostering of working together for deeper understanding and the common good,” said the archbishop, a member of the USCCB’s Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs Committee and its chairman from 2014-2017, leading the bishops’ dialogue with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America on the 500th anniversary of the Reformation in 2017.

He is also co-chair of the Polish National Church-Roman Catholic Dialogue, which examines the issues that have divided the two churches with the aim of establishing full communion.

In his July 3 statement, Cardinal Leo said he was “grateful to the Holy Father for the opportunity to serve as a member of the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue.”

“I very much look forward to dialogue and reflection on how the Catholic Church can work with other faith traditions in a positive and constructive manner as we identify areas of common concern and engagement,” he said.

An expert in canon law, diplomacy and international law, Cardinal Leo was also named a member of the Dicastery for Legislative Texts in January.

Father McDougall is a former rector of the University of Notre Dame’s Tantur Ecumenical Institute in Jerusalem and was on faculty at King’s College in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, where he assisted efforts to expand interfaith engagement.

The appointments do not impact the appointees’ primary ministerial roles.

CASTEL GANDOLFO, Italy (CNS) – After more than a decade without its most famous vacationer, the quiet town of Castel Gandolfo once again counts the pope among its summer residents.

Pope Leo XIV became the 16th pope to reside in the papal summer residence when he moved there July 6, following the recitation of the Angelus in St. Peter’s Square.

“This afternoon, I will travel to Castel Gandolfo, where I intend to have a short period of rest,” the pope told pilgrims gathered in the square. “I hope that everyone will be able to enjoy some vacation time in order to restore both body and spirit.”

The tradition of popes escaping the summer heat of Rome for the cooler Alban Hills began with Pope Urban VIII in 1626. While Pope Benedict XVI spent nearly three months in the papal villa during the summer of 2012, his successor, Pope Francis, chose not to stay there, opting instead for his Vatican residence at the Domus Sanctae Marthae.

In 2016, Pope Francis converted the papal property into a museum, opening the villa and gardens to the public.

That decision transformed the character of tourism in the town, said Marina Rossi, a local resident who has operated a mosaic workshop along the town’s main drag for more than 30 years.

“During the week there wasn’t this flow of people,” she told Catholic News Service July 1, since the popes only presented themselves publicly to pray the Angelus on Sundays. “Instead, by opening the palace and the pontifical villas, the type of tourism has changed,” shifting from frugal pilgrims to paying visitors. As a result, “the last 12 years were good for us.”

Still, she said, the return of a pope is “fantastic.”

“It’s an important showcase” for the town, Rossi said. “We’re happy, yes.”

Rossi, an artist, said she and others had considered creating a portrait of the pope, adding, “Yes, it’s an idea we’ve had; right now, we are doing stuff a bit different, more simple, because making a portrait is not the most ‘sell-able’ right away.”

Assunta Ferrini, who manages Sor Capanna, a restaurant right off the square at the foot of the papal palace, said the town has not lacked tourists in the pope’s absence.

“The tourists came, many of them,” she told CNS. “But to have a pope return is always an honor for the town, that he comes here to meet us.”

At a local coffee shop, barista Stefano Carosi echoed that sentiment. “To have the pope here among us after so long is a beautiful thing,” he said. “We’ve waited for it for so long.”

Without the steady presence of Pope Francis, he added, the town was “without that spark, that light, but now it seems like these 12 years have flown by and we hope that everything may return as before.”

(OSV News) – An Illinois town intends to purchase the childhood home of Pope Leo XIV, hoping to turn the property and its surroundings into a historical site.

The board of trustees of the Village of Dolton voted unanimously July 1 to buy the modest, one-story brick dwelling located at 212 E. 141st Pl. in Dolton.

Since the election of the first U.S.-born pope, the 75-year-old home – in which the former Robert Prevost was raised – has become a tourist attraction and even a place of pilgrimage.

“So many people are coming to the block,” Nakita Cloud, spokesperson for the Village of Dolton, told OSV News. “You see tour buses (here).”

Next-door-neighbor Donna Sagna Davis previously told CBS News Chicago that visitors are “bringing rosaries, flowers.”

Davis also told the outlet, “I’ve seen a lot of people; people from Greece, people from Italy, Germany. One woman came and she prayed, touched the door of the pope’s house, and she said she wanted to be healed.”

Dolton Mayor Jason House has highlighted the property’s potential to help revitalize the community.

A sale price for the house, which had been up for auction, will not be publicly disclosed until the transaction has been completed, Cloud said.

She noted the town had “negotiated directly with the seller and his agent, and we came up with an amount that is satisfactory for everyone.”

The final price, while not “millions of dollars,” was “certainly more than the $199,000 original auction price,” she said.

Images of the home on the real estate site Zillow show a fully renovated interior, with newer appliances, bathroom fixtures and flooring, as well a gray-white paint scheme and modern decor.

According to CBS News Chicago, resident Annette Mauro, who identified herself as a “practicing Catholic,” said at the July 1 village board meeting — which was open to the public — “I see no reason why you want to buy that house,” since the inside “does not look anything like when Father Prevost lived there.”

Cloud clarified that earlier reports about the village invoking eminent domain — whereby, under the Fifth Amendment, government can take control of private property for the benefit of public welfare, while providing just compensation to the owner — were related to “due diligence.”

“It was a disclaimer they put out to the auction house about the property being subject to eminent domain,” she explained. “If Mayor House is not the mayor in four years, and someone else comes in … we would hate for someone to go and bid and purchase a property at a million dollars that could be taken away from them.”

At the July 1 board meeting, town officials also decided to purchase a nearby residence located at 200 E. 141st Pl., which Cloud described as “kind of an eyesore at the end of the block.”

Online images viewed by OSV News at the Redfin real estate website showed that home as badly decayed, with heavy overgrowth, roof damage and what appeared to be a missing front door as well as broken windows.

“What we want to do is, in honoring the faith as well as the archdiocese (of Chicago), we want to turn that entire block into a historical site,” said Cloud. “So we’re going to acquire that property as well and fix it up.”

CBS News reported that the decision to buy the home was largely supported by Dolton residents, although a few expressed concerns the money would be better spent on other infrastructure and economic development projects.

Cloud said the village is not working with the Archdiocese of Chicago “at this time” on the transformation of Pope Leo’s childhood home into an historical site, although she added, “We’re trying to work it all out.”

OSV News is awaiting a response to its request for comment by the archdiocese.

SCRANTON – The Cathedral of Saint Peter was standing room only on Saturday, June 28, 2025, as two transitional deacons answered God’s call in a profound way by being ordained priests for the Diocese of Scranton.

Every pew was filled – with an overflow of people gathered in the back of the Cathedral – as Rev. Mr. Thomas Dzwonczyk and Rev. Mr. Andrew McCarroll joyfully began their priestly ministry.

“Just seeing the church filled with people from across our diocese and around the country … I’m blessed to be in this moment right now,” Father McCarroll said.

“It is one thing to write a paper on the priesthood but to actually have it happen, there is no comparison,” Father Dzwonczyk added. “It’s the greatest feeling in the world.”

The Most Rev. Joseph C. Bambera, Bishop of Scranton, served as principal celebrant, homilist, and ordaining prelate.

During his homily, Bishop Bambera delivered a moment of unexpected humor that brought warm laughter to the packed Cathedral.

Reflecting on the Gospel reading – Matthew 10:1-5a – the Bishop shared, “I asked Tom and Andrew why they chose it, presuming that they must have had some profound rationale for doing so. Their response: ‘Both our names are mentioned in it!’”

Laughter erupted as the faithful recognized the truth: both “Thomas” and Andrew” are listed among the original Twelve Apostles named by Christ in the passage.
But Bishop Bambera quickly pivoted to a deeper message.

“In fairness to our ordinands, scratch the surface of this passage and probe its context within Matthew’s gospel and we discover so much more than merely a roster of names,” the Bishop said, smiling. “We discover that the Apostles – and all of us – are called by the love of God as we are, from particular families and parishes and walks of life. We are called for a purpose: to embrace the great mission of evangelization – the mission of proclaiming Jesus, His life, and His saving grace.”

“The Bishop was spot on in his homily. He said priests don’t just fall out of a tree; they don’t come out of the middle of nowhere. It truly is a whole church effort. It starts in the family, but then throughout people in religious education and the Catholic schools that I went through, to the parishes where I’ve been assigned,” Father Dzwonczyk said.

The Mass, always rich in symbolism and sacred tradition, included the full Rite of Ordination. After the candidates were presented and affirmed by the Bishop, the Litany of Saints was chanted as both men lay prostrate before the altar – a powerful sign of their total surrender to God’s will.

The centerpiece of the Rite of Ordination came when Bishop Bambera laid his hands on heads of Rev. Mr. Dzwonczyk and Rev. Mr. McCarroll, invoking the Holy Spirit to consecrate them as priests. One by one, every other priest in attendance also placed their hands on both men.

Then, their hands were anointed with Sacred Chrism, marking their hands for the holy work they are now empowered to do: consecrate the Eucharist, anoint the sick, forgive sins, and shepherd the faithful. With hands newly anointed, the two new priests were each vested with a chasuble. The Rite concluded with fraternal greetings, as brother priests welcomed them into their shared vocation.

Father McCarroll said two moments during the Mass will always remain with him.

“The laying on the floor during the Litany of the Saints was significant. You feel the connection of the entire church – the people of God gathered there and the church in heaven, the saints of God – all connected in prayer at that moment,” he said. “Also, when all the priests come and they lay their hands upon you. Just knowing that we’re connected as brothers together, and we’re really working together in the vineyard of our Lord.”

Father Dzwonczyk highlighted another powerful gesture.

“For me, personally, I lost it when the Bishop was anointing my hands. He actually had to steady my hands they were shaking so badly. That is something that I’m always going to remember,” he explained.

Following the Mass, family members, parishioners, fellow clergy, and friends greeted both men outside the Cathedral. From the laughter and hugs that were shared, it was clear that the faithful were not only there to witness the Ordination Mass but to celebrate and support both men whom God had called.

While the day marked the end of years of discernment, prayer, and formation, it is only the beginning of their priestly ministry in service to the people of God.

Father Dzwonczyk has been assigned to serve as assistant pastor of the parish communities of Saints Anthony and Rocco, and Our Lady of Mount Carmel, both located in Dunmore. Father McCarroll has been assigned to serve as assistant pastor of Saint Gregory Parish, Clarks Green, and Our Lady of the Snows Parish, Clarks Summit.

“It is a blessing to be with the people,” Father McCarroll said. “Saint Gregory and Our Lady of the Snows are two great communities. They have a lot of ministries and a lot of energy and a lot of potential. I’m just excited to immerse myself into that and to be part of the fabric of those parish communities.”

“I’m just so grateful to everyone who has been a part of this journey. Having the Cathedral packed, it shows the Catholicity of the Church. It is the Universal Church, and here in Scranton the church is alive and well,” Father Dzwonczyk added.

Closing Mass for Saint Ann’s Novena July 26, 2025

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 26, 2025

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 25, 2025

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 24, 2025

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 23, 2025

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 22, 2025

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 21, 2025

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 20, 2025

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 19, 2025

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 18, 2025

SCRANTON – Father Richard Burke, C.P., Rector of Saint Ann’s Monastery and Director of Saint Ann’s Shrine Basilica, has announced this year’s Solemn Novena to Saint Ann will take place from July 17-July 26, 2025.

As the Church continues to celebrate the Jubilee Year of Hope, these days of special preaching and praying seek to foster the important virtue of hope in our lives.

Our society and our world are dealing with a great amount of uncertainty. Many people become anxious in such an atmosphere. The gift of hope seeks to make firm the foundation of faith upon which we stand.

Father Richard is also announcing this year’s preachers, Father Curtis Kiddy, C.P., of North Palm Beach, Fla., and Father Cristian Martinez, C.P., of San Juan, Puerto Rico, will provide encouragement for fostering hope in the everyday circumstances of our lives.

As we live in hope, we join together in prayer to Saint Ann seeking her intercession and companionship while praying for the people and the issues of our lives.

Please mark your calendars now and plan to join together in prayer, we look forward, day by day, with the wonderful gift of hope which only God is able to provide.

All are invited to join us at the Basilica for this special time of grace and blessings.

 

Saint Ann’s Mass & Novena July 17, 2025

WASHINGTON (OSV News) – Just over half of U.S. adults, or 52%, say they favor allowing public school teachers to lead their classes in prayers “that refer to Jesus,” while 46% of adults say they oppose it, according to an analysis from the Pew Research Center in Washington.

It also found support for Christian prayer in U.S. public schools varies widely by state.

“In 22 states, more adults say they favor allowing teachers to lead their classes in prayers that refer to Jesus than say they oppose it,” Pew said June 23, noting that support for such prayers is “particularly high in parts of the South.”

“In 12 states and the District of Columbia, more adults say they oppose allowing teachers to lead their classes in prayers that refer to Jesus than say they favor it,” Pew said. “The 16 remaining states are divided, with no statistically significant differences in the shares who favor or oppose allowing teachers to lead their students in prayers that mention Jesus.”

With 69% of adults opposed to teacher-led prayer, the District of Columbia ranks among the parts of the country “with the highest levels of opposition to allowing teachers to lead their classes in prayers that refer to Jesus.”

These findings come from the Pew Research Center’s Religious Landscape Study. Conducted from 2023 to 2024, the study surveyed nearly 37,000 U.S. adults in all 50 states about their religious affiliations, beliefs and practices along with their social and political views and demographic characteristics.

Of the 52% who say they support teacher-led prayer about Jesus in public schools, 27% “strongly” favor it. Of the 46% against it, 22% say they are “strongly” opposed.

States with a majority of adults who favor such teacher-led prayer include Mississippi, 81%; Alabama, 75%; Arkansas, 75%; Louisiana, 74%; and South Carolina, 71%; Oklahoma, Kentucky and West Virginia, 67% each; South Dakota, 65%; North Dakota, 61%; Indiana, 58%; Kansas, 58%; Missouri, 57%; Nebraska, 56%; Ohio, 53%; and Michigan, 53%.

States with a majority of adults opposed to such prayer — with three on the West Coast and six in the Northeast — include: Oregon, 65%; Washington, 61%; California, 56%; Vermont, 64%; Connecticut, 60%; New Hampshire, 60%; Minnesota, 59%; Massachusetts and Colorado, 58% each; Illinois, 54%; New York, 53%; and New Jersey, 53%.

In the remaining states, Pew said that once the survey’s margins of error are accounted for, there is “no statistically significant differences” between those in favor and those opposed to teacher-led prayer in public schools. For example, 56% of adults in Delaware and 52% in Virginia favor such prayer. In Idaho, it’s 55%, and in Arizona, 53%.

“It’s important to note that teacher-led Christian prayers are just one way that religion can play a role in public schools,” Pew said. “The 2023-24 Religious Landscape Study also asked a separate question about “allowing teachers to lead their classes in prayers that refer to God but not to any specific religion.”

Nationwide, it said, “a slightly larger share of Americans say they favor allowing teacher-led prayers referencing God (57%) than favor allowing teacher-led prayers specifically referencing Jesus (52%).”

Pew’s 2023-2024 Religious Landscape Study was conducted in English and Spanish from July 17, 2023, to March 4, 2024, among a nationally representative sample of 36,908 U.S. adults. Respondents were recruited by mail, using address-based sampling. “This approach gives nearly all U.S. adults a chance of being selected to participate,” Pew said.

VATICAN CITY (CNS) – Almost four years after Pope Francis opened the Catholic Church’s path toward synodality — a term many in the church had never heard before — his successor has thrown his support behind the last leg of the church’s synodal journey.

The Synod of Bishops, which admitted women, lay and other non-bishop voting members among its ranks during its two universal assemblies in October 2023 and 2024, “naturally retains its institutional profile and at the same time is enriched by the mature fruits of this season,” Pope Leo XIV told the ordinary council of the synod June 26. “You are the body appointed to reap these fruits and make a prospective reflection.”

Over two days, the council convened to approve a document for the synod’s final implementation stage intended to improve dialogue between local churches and the Vatican synod office, the General Secretariat for the Synod of Bishops said in a statement June 30. The document will be released July 7 at www.synod.va.

The council also discussed the work of study groups instituted by Pope Francis to deal with hot-button topics — such as women’s ordination and changes to priestly formation.

The study groups were scheduled to present interim reports on their findings in June 2025, but the synod office noted that “due to the death of Pope Francis and the election of Pope Leo XIV, there have been delays.” In agreement with Pope Leo, the deadline to submit the final reports was extended to Dec. 31, 2025, and the interim reports will be published on the synod office’s website as they are received, it said.

According to the apostolic constitution “Universi Dominici Gregis,” which governs procedures when the papacy is vacant, a council or Synod of Bishops is immediately suspended when a pope dies or resigns. All meetings, decisions and promulgations must cease until a new pope explicitly orders their continuation, or they are considered null.

The late pope launched the diocesan phase of the worldwide synodal process in October 2021, and it was originally scheduled to culminate with an in-person assembly in Rome in October 2023. Another assembly was held after a year of listening in October 2024, and in March, Pope Francis launched a three-year implementation phase of the synod that will culminate in an ecclesial assembly at the Vatican in October 2028.

Pope Leo told the synod’s ordinary council June 26, “I encourage you in this work, I pray that it may be fruitful and as of now I am grateful.”

The General Secretariat of the Synod of Bishops said that the expected document, titled “Pathways for the Implementation Phase of the Synod,” is a practical and theological guide for diocesan bishops and synodal teams as they apply the synod’s final proposals locally.

The synod office noted that this phase of the synodal process “belongs above all to the local Churches,” which are tasked with translating the synod assembly’s “authoritative proposals” into concrete pastoral practices within their respective contexts. At the same time, the synod office said the guidelines were developed to respond to questions raised by bishops and diocesan leaders in recent months and are intended to support, not replace, local discernment.

Cardinal Mario Grech, secretary-general of the Synod of Bishops, acknowledged in his opening remarks of the council’s meeting that “difficulties and resistance” to the synodal process remain. He said that while some dioceses have already begun the implementation phase with enthusiasm, others are awaiting the forthcoming guidelines “with trepidation.”

“These contrary positions must not be overlooked,” he said. “Rather, I would say they must challenge us deeply.”

Cardinal Grech proposed establishing a permanent forum, which he called a “Table of Synodality,” to foster ongoing theological and canonical reflection on synodality and encouraged greater investment in formation programs. He also said that new partnerships with academic institutions and the continued support of young theologians would help cultivate a synodal “mentality” across the church.

WASHINGTON (OSV News) – Senate Republicans on July 1 passed their version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which would enact key provisions of President Donald Trump’s legislative agenda on taxes and immigration, without any Democratic support and losing three members of their ranks.

The House would need to approve the Senate’s changes to the bill before it could reach the president’s desk for his signature. Trump has sought to do so by Independence Day, July 4.

Catholic leaders have alternately praised and criticized various provisions in the legislation.

A June 26 letter to senators from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops praised the provision that would strip funds from Planned Parenthood — now limited to just one year — while opposing others that they said would raise taxes “on the working poor while simultaneously giving large tax cuts to the wealthiest.” The letter added, “Because of this, millions of poor families will not be able to afford life-saving healthcare and will struggle to buy food for their children. Some rural hospitals will likely close.” The bishops called these provisions “unconscionable and unacceptable.”

The same day 20 U.S. Catholic bishops signed onto an interfaith effort urging the Senate to reject the bill, citing cuts to nutrition assistance and Medicaid, and its impact on immigrants among other concerns, calling it “draconian” and a “moral failure.”

The Senate worked through the previous weekend as Republican leadership sought to meet Trump’s deadline and secure enough support from their members, while Democrats used a Senate procedure to require the bill to be read in its entirety out loud by the clerk in the chamber, a process that took nearly 16 hours.

Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, broke with other members of their party to reject the bill, meaning that Vice President JD Vance had to break the tie, resulting in a 51-50 vote. Its passage came after Republicans secured the vote of Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, a late holdout.

“The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits. The OBBB fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass,” Vance, a Catholic, argued on X prior to the bill’s passage, adding, “Everything else — the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy — is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions.”

Tillis, one of the Republicans who voted against proceeding to debate on the bill, said in comments on the Senate floor that he opposed the legislation because it “will betray the very promise” the president made when he pledged not to cut Medicaid benefits.

“I did my homework on behalf of North Carolinians, and I cannot support this bill in its current form,” Tillis added in a statement. “It would result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities. This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population.”

Trump suggested on social media that he would seek a primary challenge to Tillis over his vote, but Tillis announced his intention to retire from the upper chamber. He reportedly told Trump of his decision before the primary threat. The North Carolina Senate race next year will be a key battleground state as Republicans seek to maintain their majority.

At a June 30 press briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tillis is “just wrong” and “the president and the vast majority of Republicans who are supportive of this legislation are right.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., told reporters after the vote, “This vote will haunt our Republican colleagues for years to come.”

“This bill is so irredeemable that one Republican literally chose to retire rather than vote ‘yes’ and decimate his own state,” Schumer said in apparent reference to Tillis.

Collins said in a July 1 statement shared on X that while she supports some provisions in the bill like “extending the tax relief for families and small businesses.” But she said her vote against the bill “stems primarily from the harmful impact it will have on Medicaid, affecting low-income families and rural health care providers like our hospitals and nursing homes.”

“The Medicaid program has been an important health care safety net for nearly 60 years that has helped people in difficult financial circumstances, including people with disabilities, children, seniors, and low-income families,” Collins said. “Approximately 400,000 Mainers — nearly a third of the state’s population — depend on this program.”

Mercy Sister Mary Haddad, president and CEO of the Catholic Health Association of the United States, said in a statement that the legislation was a moral failure, citing its cuts to safety-net programs like Medicaid and SNAP.

“As a nation, we have a moral responsibility to care for those in need — especially our children, the elderly, and people living in poverty,” Sister Haddad said. “It is shameful that Congress has once again prioritized the interests of the wealthy over the needs of millions of vulnerable Americans.”

“Let’s be clear: no amount of tinkering changes the underlying, fundamental flaws of H.R. 1 and its devastating impact,” she added. “This bill inflicts deep harm on essential community health and social safety-net programs, threatening the survival of rural hospitals and long-term care facilities. It places additional financial strain on already overburdened health care providers and state budgets. By protecting the most vulnerable among us, we build a healthier, more just society for all. This bill does the opposite.”

A provision in the Senate’s version of the bill would eliminate funds to health providers who also perform abortions — but just for one year.

“Republicans gave the green light to defund Planned Parenthood — a cruel, backdoor abortion ban,” Schumer wrote on X. “We forced Senate Republicans to drop their defund Planned Parenthood provision from ten years down to just one, but this will still wreak havoc on health care for millions.”

But Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, said in a statement, “Congress took a major step toward ending the forced taxpayer funding of the Big Abortion industry — a crucial victory in the fight against abortion, America’s leading cause of death, and an industry that endangers women and girls.”

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the day before the bill’s Senate passage that the bill would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034.

A provision that would have blocked states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade was defeated 99-1. The issue of AI, and its regulation for the common good, is a significant social concern raised by Pope Leo XIV.

House Republican leadership — Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., and Conference Chairwoman Lisa McClain, R-Mich. — said in a joint statement they were eager to meet Trump’s July 4 deadline.

“The American people gave us a clear mandate, and after four years of Democrat failure, we intend to deliver without delay,” they said in a statement. “Republicans were elected to do exactly what this bill achieves: secure the border, make tax cuts permanent, unleash American energy dominance, restore peace through strength, cut wasteful spending, and return to a government that puts Americans first. This bill is President Trump’s agenda, and we are making it law. House Republicans are ready to finish the job and put the One Big Beautiful Bill on President Trump’s desk in time for Independence Day.”

Johnson will have a small margin to secure enough support from his members to send the bill to the president’s desk. Some members of his party have been critical of changes the Senate made to their version of the bill.

WASHINGTON (OSV News) – The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on June 26 that there is not a private right to bring a lawsuit challenging South Carolina’s decision to end Planned Parenthood’s participation in the state’s Medicaid program. The ruling will likely allow other states to remove Planned Parenthood from their Medicaid programs.

Federal law generally prohibits the use of Medicaid funds for abortion. Supporters of allowing Planned Parenthood to receive Medicaid funds point to that group’s involvement in cancer screening and prevention services — such as pap tests and HPV vaccinations — but critics argue the funds are fungible and could be used to facilitate abortion.

Efforts to strip Planned Parenthood of these or other taxpayer funds are sometimes called “defunding.”

The case concerned a 2018 executive order signed by Gov. Henry McMaster, R-S.C., stripping two Planned Parenthood clinics in the state of Medicaid funds, a federal program for health care for people with low incomes that is administered by the states.

In response, a Planned Parenthood affiliate in South Carolina and its Medicaid patient, Julie Edwards, argued that any patients eligible for Medicaid should be able to obtain health care from any qualified provider.

That challenge prompted a key question: whether or not Medicaid recipients have the ability to sue to maintain their chosen provider. Writing for the majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch said that they do not.

“Medicaid offers States ‘a bargain,'” Gorsuch argued, adding, “In return for federal funds, States agree ‘to spend them in accordance with congressionally imposed conditions.'”

In a dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson argued the court’s majority ruling was “stymying one of the country’s great civil rights laws” the Reconstruction-era Civil Rights Act of 1871.

“In this latest chapter, South Carolina urges our Court to adopt a narrow and ahistorical reading of the 1871 Act’s first section,” she argued, adding, “That venerable provision permits any citizen to obtain redress in federal court for ‘the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws’ of the United States. South Carolina asks us to hollow out that provision so that the State can evade liability for violating the rights of its Medicaid recipients to choose their own doctors. The Court abides South Carolina’s request. I would not. For that reason, I respectfully dissent.”

Bishop Daniel E. Thomas of Toledo, Ohio, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Pro-Life Activities, welcomed the decision in a statement, saying, “South Carolina was right to deny Planned Parenthood taxpayer dollars. A group dedicated to ending children’s lives deserves no public support.”

The Catholic Church teaches that all human life is sacred from conception to natural death, and as such, opposes direct abortion.

“Abortion is not health care,” Bishop Thomas added, “and lives will be saved because South Carolina has chosen to not fund clinics that pretend it is. Publicly funded programs like Medicaid should only support authentic, life-affirming options for mothers and children in need.”

Katie Daniel, director of legal affairs and policy counsel for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, celebrated the ruling in a statement, arguing, “By rejecting Planned Parenthood’s lawfare, the Court not only saves countless unborn babies from a violent death and their mothers from dangerously shoddy ‘care,’ it also protects Medicaid from exposure to thousands of lawsuits from unqualified providers that would jeopardize the entire program.”

“Pro-life Republican leaders are eliminating government waste and prioritizing Medicaid for those who need it most — women, children, the poor, people with disabilities,” Daniel said. “Planned Parenthood was rightly disqualified. Multi-billion-dollar abortion businesses are not entitled to an unending money grab that forces taxpayers to fund America’s #1 cause of death: abortion.”

The ruling came just after the third anniversary of the high court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which was issued June 24, 2022.