Bishop
Announces Position on Meeting with
Misericordia University
Bishop Joseph F. Martino
announced today that he will not meet with
officials from Misericordia University until
they comply with his request for a public
release of specific information on how the
institution teaches Catholic morality
regarding sexuality and homosexuality, and
how it is adhering to the four essential
characteristics of a Catholic institution of
higher learning.
The Bishop, in two previous
statements, has asked that this information
be provided to Misericordia’s alumni and the
public. He has requested that the school
speak precisely, naming courses, content and
even catalog numbers.
The university has thus far
refused to do so, instead requesting a
private meeting with the Bishop.
However, the scandal that led
to the Bishop’s request was a public matter.
Therefore, no meeting will be held unless
Misericordia complies with the request for a
public release of information.
The issue arose when
Misericordia’s Diversity Institute hosted
two public presentations by Keith Boykin. In
at least one of his talks, he discussed
advocacy for issues such as same sex
marriage, and he addressed the intersection
of religion and sexuality. The Catholic
Church’s teaching on homosexual behavior was
not presented at the event.
Bishop Martino stated his
“absolute disapproval” of these events
because the university was providing a
public platform for a proponent of morality
that is “disturbingly opposed to Catholic
teaching.” The Bishop subsequently called on
Misericordia to seriously consider
dissolving the Diversity Institute.
Since Misericordia has
asserted that it “is committed deeply to its
Catholic mission,” Bishop Martino said it is
puzzling that the school would not want to
assure the public that it is teaching
Catholic morality and adhering to the four
essential characteristics of a Catholic
institution of higher learning. As stated in
Pope John Paul II’s Apostolic
Constitution on Catholic Universities,
these are:
1.
A Christian
inspiration not only of individuals but of
the university community
as such;
2.
A continuing
reflection in the light of the Catholic
faith upon the growing
treasury of human
knowledge, to which it seeks to contribute
by its own
research;
3.
Fidelity to the
Christian message as it comes to us through
the Church;
4.
An
institutional commitment to the service of
the people of God and of the
human family in
their pilgrimage to the transcendent goal
which gives meaning
to life.
Bishop Martino believes the
kind of information he is seeking should be
easy to compile and readily available.
Bishop Martino also explained
his obligation to address these matters. A
local bishop does not merely have a
“personal position” (i.e., one which is no
more valid than anyone else’s position)
about the “Catholic identity” of a local
Catholic college. Under the Church’s Code of
Canon Law, the Bishop has a “responsibility”
to evaluate and judge how all Catholic
institutions in his diocese are upholding
the principles of authentic Catholic
identity.
In particular, it is his
responsibility to ensure that institutions
of higher learning which desire to call
themselves Catholic are zealous in teaching
Catholic faith and morals.